A study was conducted in 55 randomly selected villages of Nelamangala taluk, Bangalore district in 1975 (1) to estimate the prevalence of symptoms in the general population during the two months prior to the epidemiological survey, (2) to study the nature of action taken by these symptomatics and, (3) to find out through sputum examination as to how many of them suffer from pulmonary tuberculosis. The entire population was interviewed and sputum was collected from those aged five years and above having symptoms continuously for seven days and more. A coverage of 98.8% was obtained. Symptomatics among the directly interviewed were almost double (32.3%) of those who had to be interviewed by proxy (16.8%). Proportion of symptomatics were higher in the age groups twenty years and above. 24.8% were symptomatic during the reference period of two months and 16.7% had symptoms on the day of interview. ll.1% were found to have chest symptoms. The prevalence rate of tuberculosis was found to be 21 per 1000, (for males 28 and females 14). Cough was the most prevalent and the symptom of longest duration.

The findings suggest that symptoms questioning should focus more on cough and its combination with other symptoms. Symptoms questioning as a tool to detect cases has less potential than X-ray, but data reveal that leading questions can elicit more information on symptoms and action taking. The manner of action taking was the same for chest symptoms as for other symptoms and the proportion taking action is also the same for males and females. Government health facilities are found to be the most important source of relief, indigenous medicine having some importance marked second and the private practitioners ranking only third.

Persons suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis generally experience symptoms such as cough, chest pain, fever and haemoptysis. It is possible to identify the symptomatics by interviewing them during community health surveys. The symptom survey was carried out in 62 villages and 4 town blocks of Tumkur district in Karnataka as a sequel to an epidemiological survey undertaken to estimate the prevalence of tuberculosis. The data was collected through structured schedule. The interviewers were given the identification details of individuals having X-ray shadows suggestive of tuberculosis and an equal number of matched controls within 4 weeks of the survey. A total of 1752 persons were taken into the study of whom 875 had x ray shadows and 877 were normals. Of the total persons under study 89.7% were satisfactorily interviewed. It was observed that 42.6% of the total symptomatics gave history of one symptom at the first general question, 13% responded having symptoms after being asked specific questions. In conclusion a 42.6% affirmative response to the initial question of 'How is your health' is noteworthy that an investigator is acceptable health agency as the interviewee is willing to confide in him regarding his health problems. Additional number of persons responded to direct specific questions.

It must be pointed out that interview is a generic term applied to a tool that may be used for obtaining information through verbal communication. As a tool in surveys for screening for tuberculosis it is amenable to divese techniques and has great potentialities of being applied to different situations and various categories of respondents. Hence, it is necessary to identify the nature of data to be obtained and to decide on the technique that would be most suitable. Proper training, skill and supervision of the interviewer can obviate any possible bias and subjectivity that could vitiate an interview. As compared to many of the tools of social science research, the interview is simple, easy and amenable to being used in live situations. It is also of prime importance among populations for whom vocalisation is the most important medium of communication. Hence, in a community survey for the estimation of the prevalence of chest symptomatics the interview can be a valuable tool. It also shows that the interview is adequate as a tool of community survey in tuberculosis.

A study on awareness of symptoms of pulmonary tuberculosis and action taking was repeated in the 62 villages and 4 town blocks of Tumkur district of Karnataka after an interval of 12 years. In the earlier study, 2106 persons formed the study population. In the present study, 1752 were intaken to obtain a comparison of these 1752 intaken persons who were eligible for interview, 875 were X-ray positive and 877 X-ray normal (matched control).

The study showed that 95% of patients having radiologically active tuberculosis by both X-ray readers, 70% by one reader, 49.5% inactive by both readers, were aware of symptoms. According to the bacteriological status 79.5% had symptoms among those who were sputum positive by both microscopy and culture, 62.2% among those positive by culture alone and 73.7% among patients sputum positive by any method. Regarding action taking it was observed that 49.5% of the bacteriologically positive patients took some action compared by 70% of those found to have radiologically active disease by both X-ray readers. Thus action taking was higher among the latter category in both the studies. It may be due to the fact that extent of lesions are less advanced among those bacteriologically positive than among those who were in radiologically positive stage.

The findings of the study are similar to the earlier awareness study carried out in 1963 in the same area (Tumkur). This also indicates that in spite of having advantage of DTP for a decade actual and total benefits have not reached the people.

Illness is mostly a subjective awareness of an individual, the relief of which may be sought within or outside medical or health facilities. Perception of illness vary from people to people depending upon cultural, ethnic and socio-economic differences. Perception of symptoms by persons suffering from tuberculosis is very high yet only half of them approach modern medical facility for alleviation of their suffering. A survey was carried out in rural area of Hoskote taluk, Bangalore district to determine perceived morbidity and accessible medical relief in 1433 households belonging to 18 villages; of them, 1393 (97%) were successfully interviewed. Selected households belonged to three types of villages i.e., those being within 3 kms of a i)PHC, ii)taluk headquarters hospital and non- Governmental health centre.

Of the 9286 individual belonging to 1393 households satisfactorily interviewed regarding health, 1201 (12.9%) were found to be ill at some point of time during the reference period of one month. No differences were observed in the perception of morbidity or in the health seeking behaviour in the three groups of villages. Persons with symptoms/disease accounted for 88.8% of the total sickness, 3.4% for injuries and 9.3% for disabilities, while action taking was 61.6%, 90% and 13.5% respectively. Age sex distribution showed no difference in illness occurrence. Sputum was collected from 147 chest symptomatics and seven were found to be sputum positive. Government health facilities were utilized by 37.6% of the sick persons, private doctors by 36.4%, nature medicine by 10.6% and home remedies by only 9.9%. In conclusion, the services at the government health facilities were acceptable and were utilized if accessible. Prompt and adequate relief for injuries and acute indispositions ensures confidence of the people and better utilization.