EPIDEMIOLOGY <<Back
 
 
001
TUBERCULIN SENSITIVITY IN YOUNG CHILDREN (0-4 YEARS OLD) AS AN INDEX OF TUBERCULOSIS IN THE COMMUNITY.
NL Bordia, Anton Geser, J Maclary, I Mundt & Kul Bhushan: Indian J TB 1960, 8, 25-43.

The purpose of this study was to find out whether the prevalence of infection in young children might be used as an index of the tuberculosis problem in a population. Tuberculin testing was done in a random sample of 2,883 children (0-4 years) in Bangalore city, of those 2,589 (89.8%) actually completed testing. A total of 4340 children were registered in 59 villages and of these 4090 (94.2%) were tuberculin tested. The villages were from Bangalore, Kolar and Mandya as these districts were within 100 miles from Bangalore city. The team went from house to house and made a complete registration of the children 0-4 years in the selected houses. Information on socio-economic status, density of population etc., was also collected before giving tuberculin 1 TU RT 23 with Tween 80.

The results of the study showed that prevalence of infection in 0-4 years age group of cantonment area was 1.6% and in the crowded city area 4.1% at 14mm induration level. In the rural population, the prevalence of tuberculosis infection was 2%. In the city, a positive correlation between tuberculosis infection and socio-economic condition was obtained while it was not seen in rural areas. It was not possible to establish any correlation between tuberculosis disease and infection either in rural or urban areas, as the population was not examined for the prevalence of tuberculosis disease.

KEY WORDS: PREVALENCE, INFECTION, CHILDREN, RURAL, URBAN, COMMUNITY.

006
SOME ASPECTS OF A TB PREVALENCE SURVEY IN A SOUTH INDIAN DISTRICT
Raj Narain, A Geser, MV Jambunathan & M Subramanian: Bull WHO 1963, 29, 641-64 & Indian J TB 1963, 9, 85-116.

The objective was to establish the prevalence rates for tuberculosis infection, radiologically active pulmonary tuberculosis and bacteriologically confirmed diseases for different age and sex groups. Tumkur District in Mysore State consisting of 2,392 villages, 10 towns of was selected for the study. The district headquarter town Tumkur was excluded from the survey. Random sample of 62 villages and 4 town blocks having a population of 34,746 persons constituted the study population. All the individuals available in the registered population were given a Mantoux test with 1 TU RT 23 with Tween 80. Longitudinal diameter of induration was read 3-4 days after the test. At the time of tuberculin test, all persons aged 10 years and above were offered a single 70mm photofluorogram. For each picture read as abnormal, a spot specimen of sputum of the individual concerned was collected at the time of reading the tuberculin test. Age and sex distribution of infection and disease were studied.

Various parameters concerning the prevalence of infection and disease in the community were reported. Prevalence rate of infection in all ages and both sexes of the population was found to be 38.3%, radiologically active tuberculosis 1.86% and 0.41% sputum positive disease. The infection and disease increased with age; of the total diseased, half were in age group 40 years and more and about 2/3 among males.

KEY WORDS: SURVEY, PREVALENCE, INFECTION, DISEASE, CASE, COMMIUNITY, RURAL, URBAN.

015
EXAMINATION OF MULTIPLE SPUTUM SPECIMENS IN A TUBERCULOSIS SURVEY
P Chandrasekhar, SS Nair, K Padmanabha Rao, G Ramanatha Rao & Pyare Lal: Tubercle, 1970, 51, 255-62.

Prevalence surveys are useful for estimating the tuberculosis problem in different countries. Three techniques are commonly used in surveys, tuberculin test, mass miniature radiography and sputum examination. Each has its own limitations. A limitation of sputum examination is that all the sputum positive cases in the community cannot be diagnosed when only one sample of sputum is examined from each eligible person. Multiple sputum examinations are not often possible under field conditions of surveys covering the whole community. It would be worthwhile to have some idea of the extent of under-diagnosis in sputum examination. For this purpose, during an epidemiological survey, four specimens of sputum were collected within seven days of X-ray examination from each person with an abnormal chest X-ray in 30 villages of a district of south India. Each specimen was examined by Fluorescent Microscopy (FM), Ziehl Neelson (ZN) technique and culture.

There were 34 culture positive cases among 2,164 persons for whom all the four culture examination results were available. Of them, 21 (62%) were found positive on one specimen. The second specimen increased the positivity to 32 (95%). Thus, for detecting both smear and culture positive cases two specimens are adequate. A third specimen is helpful for detecting cases positive by culture alone. An estimate of prevalence obtained from one sputum specimen can be estimated for the prevalence obtained from many specimens by applying correction factor of 1.67 and estimates based on two specimens by applying 1.26. Of the remaining 37 smear positive cases detected by one specimen, 20 were smear positive and culture negative. Of the remaining 17 smear positive and culture positive, 14(82%) were detected by one smear examination only.

ZN positives not confirmed by culture (mostly with less than four bacilli reported in the smear) increased from 7 from the first specimen to 18 from all four specimens, while positives confirmed by culture method showed only a marginal increase from 13 to 15. FM did not have this disadvantage as only two were culture negative among the 18 smear positive results by FM method. Examination of two specimens by FM detected about 95% of cases demonstrable by this method. But with the ZN technique additional specimens may add more “false positives”. Thus, for detecting cases both smear and culture-positive two specimens appear adequate. A third specimen is helpful for detecting cases positive on culture only.

KEY WORDS: SPUTUM EXAMINATION, MULTIPLE SPUTUM SPECIMEN, SURVEY, RURAL, ZIEHL NEELSON, FLUORESCENT, CULTURE.

017
DISTRIBUTION OF TUBERCULOUS INFECTION AND DISEASE IN CLUSTERS OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
SS Nair, G Ramanatha Rao & P Chandrasekhar: Indian J TB 1971, 18, 3-9.

Data from 62 randomly selected villages in a district of south India, which formed part of a prevalence survey carried out by the National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore, during 1960-61, has been made use of. The survey covered 29,813 persons in 5,266 households. There were 70 cases with bacilli demonstrable either in smear or culture and 300 suspect cases. Using the village map (prepared by survey staff), ‘case clusters’ were formed first, with each case household as nucleus and adjacent households within a maximum distance of about 20 meters on either side of the case households. Households closest to the nucleus household on either side have been called as 1st neighbourhood and those coming next in proximity on either side as a 2nd neighbourhood and so on. The case household and its four neighbourhood together was called a cluster. If another case household was found within 4th neighbourhood of the first case the cluster was extended by including the 4th neighbourhood of the new case also. Such clusters were called composite case clusters and clusters with only one case household as simple case clusters. Similarly, suspect case clusters were formed and differentiated as simple suspect clusters or composite suspect clusters. Further, to serve as a control group, non-case clusters were constituted from a systematic sample of 10% households that were not included in case or suspect case clusters.

Out of 60 case clusters formed, only 7 have multiple cases showing that there was no evidence of high concentration of disease in case clusters. While the percentage of child contacts (0-14 years) infected was considerably higher in case clusters (25.8%), there was not much difference between suspect case clusters (14.9%) and non-case clusters (9.8%). Similarly, there was not much difference between simple and composite clusters. Infection among child contacts was higher in case households as compared to their neighbourhoods. To get some idea of the zone of influence of a case or suspect case, prevalence of infection was studied for 10 neighbourhoods, in simple clusters to avoid the influence of multiple cases. It appeared that the zone of influence of a case may extend at least upto the 10th neighbourhood. It was also noted that there was very little difference between zones of influence of suspect cases and non-cases. Case clusters in which the nucleus case had shown activity of lung lesion (evident on X-ray reading) or had cough showed significantly higher infection among child contacts. Clusters around cases positive on both smear and culture did not show higher infection than those around cases positive on culture only. (This may be due to sputum examination of single specimen only).

Out of the total infected persons in the community, only 2% were in case households and 7% in suspect case households, over 90% being in non-case households. The zone of influence of a case extending at least upto the 10th neighbourhood and the overlapping of such zones of influence of cases, present and past, seems to be the most probable explanation for the wide scatter of infection in the community. Prevalence of infection among child contacts was definitely higher in case clusters. But, the significance of this could be understood only from a study of the incidence of disease during subsequent years in different types of clusters. It is significant that only 10% of the total infected persons in the community were found in case clusters. The case yield in general population, cluster contacts, household contacts and symptomatics attending general health institutions have been also compared. The case yield in the last group (10%) is much higher than the case yield from both types of contacts (0.7% and 0.6%) which where only slightly higher than the case yield from the general population (0.4%).

KEYWORDS: RURAL, HOUSEHOLDS, CLUSTERS, CASE, SUSPECT CASE, CONTACT, PREVALENCE, INFECTION, DISEASE, SURVEY.
 
  <<Back