Survey with MMR remains as one of the most important methods available for measuring the size and extent of tuberculosis, specially in developing countries. Its value in case-finding programmes is well recognised. Nevertheless, mass miniature radiography with a single picture of the chest has a wide margin of error owing to the intra & inter-individual differences in X-ray reading. A study was undertaken to know the errors involved by repeating an X-ray picture after an interval of 3 to 4 months and judging the first picture in the light of a comparative reading of the two pictures. It is postulated that two pictures taken at an interval, may afford better judgement regarding the assessment of a case than a single picture only. A prevalence survey was carried out in Tumkur district in 1960-61, among 62 villages and 4 towns; 20 villages were selected for this study. A total of 8,000 persons were registered, 5,300 of them were X-rayed and re-read by two readers. Photofluorograms were repeated after three and a half months after the first picture. At the time of repeat X-ray, a spot sample of sputum was collected from persons with abnormal shadows.

Briefly the findings of the study were: (1) About 20% of bacillary cases were among those with inactive or non- tubercular shadows on the basis of a single X-ray film. (2) Inter-individual agreement for X-ray active cases was of the order of 50%. (3) Intra-individual agreement for X-ray active cases was 52% for one reader and 69% for the two readers. (4) Mass miniature radiography with a single film, in spite of its inherent limitations, is the best available method both for surveys as well as for case-finding programmes due to its ability to find cases as well as potential cases in a short time. (5) Even the agreement between two sputum samples collected within an interval of 1-3 days was 42% for positive results.