Prevalence surveys are useful for estimating the tuberculosis problem in different countries. Three techniques are commonly used in surveys, tuberculin test, mass miniature radiography and sputum examination. Each has its own limitations. A limitation of sputum examination is that all the sputum positive cases in the community cannot be diagnosed when only one sample of sputum is examined from each eligible person. Multiple sputum examinations are not often possible under field conditions of surveys covering the whole community. It would be worthwhile to have some idea of the extent of under-diagnosis in sputum examination. For this purpose, during an epidemiological survey, four specimens of sputum were collected within seven days of X-ray examination from each person with an abnormal chest X-ray in 30 villages of a district of south India. Each specimen was examined by Fluorescent Microscopy (FM), Ziehl Neelson (ZN) technique and culture.

There were 34 culture positive cases among 2,164 persons for whom all the four culture examination results were available. Of them, 21 (62%) were found positive on one specimen. The second specimen increased the positivity to 32 (95%). Thus, for detecting both smear and culture positive cases two specimens are adequate. A third specimen is helpful for detecting cases positive by culture alone. An estimate of prevalence obtained from one sputum specimen can be estimated for the prevalence obtained from many specimens by applying correction factor of 1.67 and estimates based on two specimens by applying 1.26. Of the remaining 37 smear positive cases detected by one specimen, 20 were smear positive and culture negative. Of the remaining 17 smear positive and culture positive, 14(82%) were detected by one smear examination only.

ZN positives not confirmed by culture (mostly with less than four bacilli reported in the smear) increased from 7 from the first specimen to 18 from all four specimens, while positives confirmed by culture method showed only a marginal increase from 13 to 15. FM did not have this disadvantage as only two were culture negative among the 18 smear positive results by FM method. Examination of two specimens by FM detected about 95% of cases demonstrable by this method. But with the ZN technique additional specimens may add more “false positives”. Thus, for detecting cases both smear and culture-positive two specimens appear adequate. A third specimen is helpful for detecting cases positive on culture only.