At present most of the districts in India have a TB clinic at the district headquarters, where TB patients are diagnosed and treated. Most of the clinics serve the town population and only a small proportion of the rural population are able to attend the clinics due to long distances. The wide distribution of patients in rural areas will necessitate the provision of extensive anti-tuberculosis services and they should be provided as near to the patients' home as possible. This cannot be achieved by creating large number of specialised services (TB clinics) in the district, as this will not only be beyond the resources but wasteful. As such, provision of anti-tuberculosis services in rural areas can be achieved by integration of the primary health centres and dispensaries. The problems of treatment in rural areas are envisaged as technical, organizational and personnel. Under the technical problems, the choice of anti-microbials is considered. The anti-microbials should be effective, cheap and acceptable to the patients. INH PAS, INH alone or INH Thiacetazone are considered suitable. Streptomycin containing drug regimens are difficult for the health services to deliver them to the patients in rural areas. Even with oral drugs INH + PAS or INH alone, drug regularity are 26.3% and 24.6%. The other technical limitation of treatment is the probability of increase in drug resistance due to the wide application of drug treatment which might be irregular. This has not been considered as enough justification for withholding treatment to the vast majority of patients, as its epidemiological and clinical significance in India are yet to be fully understood. The District TB Programme provides a firm organisational structure on the basis of which improvement can constantly be introduced for smooth functioning, constant supervision, proper orientation training and demonstration of the programme by the District TB Centre if necessary.

The organisational problems listed are: irregularity of drug intake and drug collection; their identification, default at drug collection, intake and remedial action, maintenance of records, check up while on treatment and follow up after completion of treatment. The paper suggests that regular collection could be taken as an index of regular drug intake. Defaulter actions could retrieve about 30% of the defaulters. Check up during treatment as well as follow up after treatment were found to be not acceptable to the patients due to a number of reasons. Training of staff to render services is also one of the biggest hurdles. The remedial measures are stressing tuberculosis as a community problem at the undergraduate and post graduate levels, training of the staff at every level of the programme and arrangement of seminars and group discussions with the administrators and medical personnel.