An operational study of two regimens of Short Course Chemotherapy (SCC) to assess their efficacy under programme conditions, applicability and feasibility in District TB Programme (DTP) was undertaken in an urban TB centre. The two regimens studied were 1SHRZ/7TH and 2SHR/6TH. Their operational efficacy (efficiency) was found to be 87% and 92% respectively which had already been reported in an earlier paper. The various factors i.e., initial willingness, drug default, treatment completion pattern, adverse drug reactions and initial drug resistance with their potential harmful effects on the treatment outcome as well as work load and extra cost these regimens entail for DTP organisation are discussed in this paper.

Out of a total of 1822 smear positive patients diagnosed at the Lady Willingdon State TB Centre during intake period (Feb '84 to March '85), 1126 were residents of Bangalore City. Of these 695 (61.7%) were unwilling to attend the clinic daily for 2 months, 27 were unfit and one was excluded by mistake. Thus, 403 (38.3%) initially willing patients were classified either as 'core group' or 'Non core group’, according to the history of previous anti TB treatment (321 and 82 respectively). Of the 695 (77.6%) unwilling persons, majority were those who pleaded inability to attend daily for 2 months without specifying any particular reason. Refusal of SCC due to injections accounted for 12.8% and 9.5% wanted to take treatment elsewhere. Old age influenced willingness adversely.

Of the 321 patients in the core group, 56 were excluded due to missing more than 50% of intensive phase doses. Among the remaining patients, 61 (48%) out of 127 patients on Regimen A and 48 (34%) out of 138 on Regimen B, did not make a single default in the intensive phase. Of the total 910 defaults for which actions were taken, 640 (70%) were retrieved by letter writing, among the remaining 293 (72%) were retrieved by home visiting. Main reasons for default elicited during home visits were: going out of station (52.9%) followed by patients being busy with work (19.1%). Compensatory phase was availed by 156 of the 265 patients who missed one or more doses due to default in the treatment. The pattern of treatment completion of 321 core group patients in the two regimens were similar i.e., in both the phases 65% for Regimen A and 63% for Regimen B. Incidence of minor adverse reactions was 28% and major toxic reactions were experienced by 8.4% of patients. Workload for treating 321 patients was due to supervised administration of drug 45 patients per day. Letter writing to 3.1 per patients, home visiting 1.1 per patient and doctor's attention for adverse reaction 2 occasions per patient. This could be managed with the existing staff. The cost of Regimen A was Rs.220/ per patient and for Regimen B, 268/ per patient. Cost to patient for transportation was Rs.70/ and Rs.113/ for Regimen A and B respectively.The major disturbing finding of the study was initial low acceptability of about 40% for SCC. The home visiting which was crucial in increasing the completion rate in this study is usually not available in most of the DTCs. Workload, adverse reactions etc. were not of any problem for implementation of SCC in the programme.