|
|
|
|
081 |
A SOCIO-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF OUT-PATIENTS ATTENDING
A CITY TUBERCULOSIS CLINIC IN INDIA TO JUDGE THE PLACE OF SPECIALIZED
CENTRES IN TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL PROGRAMME |
DR Nagpaul, MK Vishwanath & G Dwarakanath: Bull
WHO 1970, 43, 17-34. |
The study was carried out at Lady Willingdon Tuberculosis
Demonstration & Training Centre, Bangalore to inquire into the
epidemiological and sociological characteristics of patients attending
a city TB clinic for the first time, to ascertain the reason for
attendance and the nature of previous treatment if any. It was also
to see whether there was a preference for seeking specialists and
specialised services for alleviation of the symptoms experienced
and whether there were any differences amongst the urban and rural
attenders. A fifty per cent random sample of 2,658 out patients
during 6l working days, formed the study population. They were interviewed
by using a questionnaire based on the above mentioned objectives.
247 were not eligible due to incomplete record and below 5 years
of age.
Majority of the out patients were in 20 30 years
of age and were wage earners. Nearly 80% were aware of their symptoms
and contained 95% of the tuberculosis cases detected at the clinic.
Most of them were having 2 3 symptoms. No difference in time of
reporting was observed among urban or rural patients; 61% of the
urban and 42% of the rural patients attended the clinic within 3
months from the onset of their symptoms. Distance is a major obstacle.
Upto 4.8 km the number of new outpatients was large but the case
yield was poor. As the distance increased the out patients decreased
but the case yield was more, suggesting a selective process influenced
by distance. It was also found that 20% of the out patients came
of their own without any prior contact with any other source of
treatment, 32% had previous contact with other health institutions,
31% were actually referred by them and 17% were advised by BCG workers.
Further analysis that of the 1,642 patients who had previous contact
with health institutions, 84% were at general health institutions,
10% at specialised TB clinics and 6% were others. Of the remaining
eligible 2,403 patients, 83% were from urban and 17% from rural
areas. Sputum was collected from 2,308 patients. Of them, 179 (7.8%)
were found to be positive by direct microscopy or culture or both
and 169 were positive by culture (91% confirmation by culture).
131 (80%) were sensitive to isoniazid and 32 were isoniazid resistant.
The data obtained suggests that attendance at a
specialized tuberculosis centre is not necessarily a function of
awareness of symptoms and of the knowledge that such specialised
services exist. It also does not support the theory that people
prefer specialized institutions in cities. It is also seen than
urban and rural patients behave in almost the same way in that their
first contact for symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis, is initially
at the general medical services and they should be strengthened
with adequate means for diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis.
|
KEY WORDS: CONTROL PROGRAMME, SOCIO EPIDEMIOLOGY,
SPECIALISED CENTRE. |
083 |
PREVALENCE OF SYMPTOMS IN A SOUTH INDIAN RURAL COMMUNITY
AND UTILIZATION OF AREA HEALTH CENTRE |
DR Nagpaul, GVJ Baily, M Prakash & GE Rupert Samuel:
Indian J Med Res 1977, 66, 635-47. |
The broad relationship between the extent and pattern
of sickness in a south Indian rural community, attendance at the
Area Health Centre (AHC) and service rendered to the sick at the
centre were studied by National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore.
The objectives were to study (i) point prevalence of symptoms of
all kinds and their pattern (ii) attendance at the AHC and the pattern
of symptoms among them: and (iii) number of visits for each spell
of sickness, by nature of symptom, laboratory tests offered, and
referral to better equipped health institutions. A 30,000 population
served by the Bettahalasur Primary Health Centre (PHC) which is
20 km. away from Bangalore city was chosen. The selection of villages
was done by random sample so that about 1000 persons from each of
5 field health workers' area was available for symptoms questioning.
The out patients at the PHC were questioned for symptoms by the
PHC medical officer in a manner exactly similar to that for the
community by the trained NTI para medical staff. The answers given
by patients were recorded by NTI staff both at the centre and at
the community. On revisits made for the same spell of sickness,
the interval in days from the first visit, any laboratory tests
done and reference to better equipped institutions were also recorded.
The point prevalence of sickness in the area
was 9.5%; cough, pain and fever, in that order were the three
cardinal symptoms that accounted for 68% of the total sickness in
the community. Only 1.3% of the sick, at any point of time, had
attended the AHC but the attendance by the sick persons residing
in the village where the health centre is located was 9.2%. The
composition of the out patients attendance was significantly different
from that of the sick in the community in respect of age, sex and
symptoms. Thus, women and the elderly persons who also constitute
a major reservoir of tuberculosis, tended to disregard their symptoms
while younger persons in the productive age group had availed the
health centre facilities more freely. Among symptoms, cough was
the most ignored. Of the total out patients, 71% had attended only
once, 18% twice and 11% three times or more for any particular episode
of sickness. Only 7 9% were offered laboratory examination and an
insignificant number were referred to better equipped health institutions.
|
KEY WORDS: SYMPTOM PREVALENCE, RURAL COMMUNITY,
RURAL HEALTH SERVICES. |
|
|