The material on resistant strains of mycobacterium tuberculosis is derived from the longitudinal survey conducted from 1961-68 in a random sample of 133 villages of 3 taluks of Bangalore district. About 54,000 persons aged five years or more were surveyed 3 times at an interval of 18 months, two samples of sputum were collected from persons whose chest X-rays were judged to have abnormal shadows. The sputum specimens were examined by direct smear and culture and sensitivity tests were performed.

An attempt is made to study prevalence, fate, source and infectivity of resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis in three rounds. PREVALENCE: In the 3 rounds, 199, 194 and 176 cases respectively yielded positive cultures; Of them, 30, 36 and 53 cases were having resistant strains. At round III, the number of culture positive cases has not fallen significantly, but the number of strains resistant to INH alone has sharply increased (13, 18 & 35). Both findings are likely to be due to the treatment with INH alone offered at round II and also due to the fact that treatment was taken very irregularly. FATE: Over period of 3 years, of the cases with INH resistant strains, more than 1/3rd were dead, 1/4th continued to remain positive and resistant, and 1/4th became culture negative. Whereas, of the cases with strains sensitive to INH, less than 1/3rd were dead, 1/3rd became negative and the remaining were positive, 1/2 with sensitive strains and 1/2 with resistant strains. SOURCE OF CASES: The prevalence of cases with resistant strains at any one round is not due to the persistence of such cases from previous rounds but by development of new cases with such strains at each round. INFECTIVITY: The incidence of infection among contacts with sensitive strain was significantly more than among the contacts of cases with resistant strain. It is inferred that the infectivity of sensitive strains is more than that of the resistant strains.

The degree of the risk of infection and disease in man from drug resistant strains of mycobacterium tuberculosis is not clear. An increase in the prevalence of primary resistance indicates the extent of such risk while an increase of secondary or acquired resistance could be considered as a problem of the individual patient and may reflect limitations of his treatment.

The present report describes the prevalence of strains with acquired or primary resistance or of sensitive strains found in 3 successive surveys in a sizable random sample of village in a south Indian district. Changes in the status of cases with such strains from one survey to another and their infectivity among household contacts are also described. The prevalence of tuberculosis infection among household contacts of cases with acquired resistance to isoniazid was significantly higher than those with primary resistance or with sensitive culture. This was probably due to the longer duration of sputum positivity of isoniazid resistant strains at the time of diagnosis. But infectivity as judged by the incidence of new infection among household contacts was generally less for cases with acquired or primary resistance than for cases with sensitive cultures, though the difference observed was not statistically significant. A large number of culture positive cases especially those with primary resistance had no radiological evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis. The prevalence of primary resistance was high in certain categories of cases and the differences between cases with primary resistance and those with acquired resistance were many and large. It was suggested that this could be due to the primary resistant cultures being those of atypical mycobacteria, despite positivity in the niacin test. There was a significant increase in the number of cases with acquired resistance to isoniazid at the third survey owing to the irregular treatment and supply of INH alone after the second round. The prevalence of primary resistance at the three rounds was almost the same.