What is the rationale of collecting three specimens for sputum microscopy?
Ans: |
Of the total smear
positive cases presenting at health Institutions, about 69% can be detected by smear
examination of first sputum specimen and another 20% by examination of second specimen.
The additional case yield by subsequent specimen is minimal. Therefore, a minimum of two
specimens should be examined for obtaining acceptable sensitivity of smear microscopy as a
case finding tool.
Further, there is likelihood albeit small of
single positive sputum smear result to be false positive. However, the chances of two
positive results to be false positive are practically non-existent. Therefore, the
criteria of at least two smear positive results to label a case as smear positive
increases the specificity of the test. Since the bacilli are not excreted consistently in
all specimens, at least three specimens should be examined to satisfy the above criterion.
|
|
Why should we examine at least 200
oil-immersion fields to declare a sputum smear as negative?
Ans: |
A sputum smear is spread over an area of 200
mm2 and contains about 0.01 ml of the specimen. Each oil-immersion field has an
area of 0.02 mm2. Therefore, there are 10,000 fields on the slide. If a
specimen contains 5000 bacilli/ml, there will be 50 bacilli distributed over entire smear
and 1 bacilli over 200 fields.
Considering that the bacilli are not distributed
evenly over the smear, there must be at least 10,000 bacilli/ml to detect 1 bacillus over
200 fields.
|
|
What precautions are needed to reduce false
positive sputum smear results?
Ans: |
Rinse mouth before sputum collection or collect specimen before
food.
Use separate wooden stick for each smear preparation and stain
each slide separately on a rack.
Use new slides. Nevertheless, the scratches on the slide can be
differentiated as these occur in parallel rows and are found deeper.
Use fresh stains and preferably filter the stains before use.
Preferably, use distilled water to avoid false positive result
from environmental mycobacteria.
Do not touch the slide with the objective of the microscope or the
oil dropper.
Clean lens with a lens cleaning paper (not cotton) after exam of
each slide.
|
|
What are common reasons of false negative results?
Ans: |
Improper guidance to the patient resulting in poor quality of the
sputum sample is the most common reason of a false negative result.
Bacilli may loose acid fastness if exposed to excessive heat (over
heating while fixing the slide), direct sunlight, or long period of storage in hot and
humid conditions.
Smear not prepared from blobs that contain dead caseous tissue
discharged from cavity.
Too thin or too thick smear
Improper fixing
To short carbol-fuchsin staining or boiling it
Intensive counter staining
Erratic and brief examination
Administrative errors
|
|
What is the role of X-ray in RNTCP?
Ans: |
Chest X-ray has a role in differential
diagnosis of pulmonary disease among chest symptomatic patients whose sputa are
consistently negative on smear microscopy. |
|
Is it possible to
detect cases early by X-ray or culture?
Ans: |
Smear positive cases do not necessarily pass
through an early smear negative stage and only a few smear positive cases would be
prevented by use of additional more sensitive methods for detecting pulmonary TB cases,
which will also shift priority from detecting and treating most infectious cases. |
|
What is the role of culture?
Ans: |
A cavity of 2-cm diameter contains about 100
million organisms, easily detected by sputum smear microscopy. Almost the same number of
new cases can be detected by the first two smears as by first 3-culture examination.
Therefore, the additional yield of cases by culture is small. Only nodular lesions
discharging small amounts of bacilli are negative by microscopy. Moreover, only culture
positive TB cases (negative on microscopy) discharge bacilli intermittently, compared to
smear positive cases, which discharge bacilli more consistently. Nevertheless, culture has
a role in drug sensitivity testing, diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB like lymph node TB and
for differential diagnosis in a few cases after carefully evaluating microscopy and
radiology. |
|
Why are there so many grades of microscopy while
treatment does not change with grading?
Ans: |
Grading assists in quality control and also
saves time since fewer fields have to be examined for higher grades. It also assists in
monitoring prognosis during course of treatment. A higher proportion of 2+ and 3+ smears
are likely to remain positive at the end of intensive phase and may require additional one
month of intensive Phase. |
|
Why should the grading vary from one sample to
another in the same patient?
Ans: |
Bacilli are not evenly distributed in a
specimen but are found in clumps. (Specimens consistently positive contain at least 105
to 106 bacilli per ml. |
|
What should be done if scanty positive is the
result of smear microscopy among chest
symptomatics?
Ans: |
A scanty positive smear result should be
supported by another positive smear (more than scanty positive) or by suggestive chest
X-ray. Otherwise, repeat sputum collection and smear examination is preferable.
|
|
Why is it important to exam smear within a
week of its preparation?
Ans: |
In hot & humid climates, the bacilli seem
to loose their acid-fatness. Even the stained bacilli may also loose the stain by osmosis
in such climates. Therefore, slides labeled positive for Acid fast Bacilli (AFB) by lab
technician (L.T.) but negative by senior lab technician (STLS) should be re-stained. |
|
It has been observed that false negative errors
are more common in sputum microscopy. On the
other hand, only 10% random sample of
negative slides is cross-checked in RNTCP?
Ans: |
The purpose of cross checking is to identify
lab technicians that require retraining rather than identification of individual slide
errors. |
|
What is the role of newer diagnostic tests?
Ans: |
(i) Serological tests have poor sensitivity
and specificity. Their sensitivity is highest in patients with smear positive disease and
much lower among TB cases not detected by smear microscopy viz. sputum smear negative
cases of pulmonary TB, extra-pulmonary TB, children diagnosed with TB and HIV infected TB
cases. Also, these tests do not reliably distinguish active TB from dormant infection.
(ii) Amplification tests e.g. polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) are 95% sensitive in smear positive cases and only 50% sensitive in smear
negative and culture positive cases. Though specificity is high, it is lower under field
conditions. In addition, inability to distinguish viable from dead bacilli and high cost
dissuade their use in developing countries.
(iii) The Assay of cell-mediated immunity is
highly complex.
|
|
What are the causes of smear positive specimen
negative on culture?
Ans: |
(i) False positive smear result
(ii) Bacilli might have lost ability to grow in
culture due to the following reasons:
- Bacilli killed or harmed by treatment
- Exposure to heat and sunlight
- Long storage of sputum specimen
- Excessive decontamination procedures while processing the
specimen for culture
|
|
Why a cut off point of one month is considered for
labeling a patient as a new case?
Ans: |
Patients with history of treatment of less
than one month have been found to respond similarly, as those never treated before. Also,
the chances of development of drug resistance with less than one month therapy are remote. |
|
Is there a higher incidence of TB among contacts?
What is the role of contact tracing under RNTCP?
Ans: |
Though relative risk of acquiring infection
and developing TB is higher among contacts, the case yield from contact tracing is low.
However, the risk of breakdown is maximum during the period immediately following
infection, especially among children. Therefore, all child contacts and symptomatic adult
contacts of smear positive cases, irrespective of the duration of symptoms should be
examined at the health centre, to identify and treat TB cases and to provide preventive
treatment to children. |
|
|
Why is it necessary to directly observe treatment?
Ans: |
At least one third of
patients receiving self-administered treatment do not adhere to treatment. It is
impossible to predict which patients will take medicines regularly. Therefore, directly
observed treatment is necessary at least in the initial phase of treatment to ensure
adherence and achieve sputum smear conversion. A TB patient missing one attendance can be
traced immediately and counseled. No method other than directly observed treatment has
been able to achieve 85% cure rate of new smear positive cases. |
|
What is lag period and its use?
Ans: |
The tubercle bacilli when exposed to a drug
do not multiply for varying duration, which is called lag period. This property of the
bacilli is utilized as the basis of intermittent therapy. |
|
What is the basis of drug regimens?
Ans: |
Drug regimens are decided in consideration of
the following facts:
Mode of action of individual drugs
The dose of each drug depends on minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC) i.e. the minimum drug concentration that inhibits bacterial growth in-vitro, and
Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) i.e. the concentration at
which bacteria are killed. MBC is usually higher than MIC.
Prevention of drug resistance.
Demonstration of efficacy during drug trials and field trials in
terms of sputum conversion and relapse.
Minimal side effects.
Cost effectiveness.
Operational feasibility.
|
|
What is the role of each drug during intensive
phase?
Ans: |
INH has very high early bactericidal activity
(EBA) and acts on rapidly multiplying extra-cellular bacilli. It accounts for 95% kill in
bacillary population. Remaining bacilli metabolize slowly and are killed preferentially by
‘Rifampicin’. INH is also most effective drug for preventing resistance to other
drugs. On the other hand, other drugs are not so efficient in preventing resistance to
INH, which is therefore more common.
Rifampicin also has high bactericidal activity but
starts acting little later. It acts on rapid as well as intermittently (found in caseous
lesions) multiplying bacilli.
Pyrazinamide acts on intra-cellular bacilli that
are particularly inhibited by acid environment inside macrophages.
Ethambutol is the companion drug to prevent drug
resistance.
|
|
What is the role of INH and Rifampicin during
Continuation Phase?
Ans: |
Rifampicin is the main sterilizing drug in
this phase. The role of INH is mainly to prevent drug resistance to
Rifampicin. |
|
Why Pyrizinamide or Ethambutol is not included in
Continuation phase of Cat I?
Ans: |
Pyrizinamide has no additional benefit if
given beyond 2-3 months, as seen in clinical trials. Ethambutol is not required because
the chances of drug resistant to INH or Rifampicin developing in continuous phase is
negligible as the number of bacilli is drastically reduced in this phase. |
|
Why Cat II cannot be given for serious
extra-pulmonary cases like TBM?
Ans: |
Streptomycin has limited penetration to
membranes, however it can be given intra-thecal in case of serious cases of
TBM.
|
|
Why 3 drugs are given during Continuation
Phase of Cat II?
Ans: |
The re-treatment cases are more likely to
harbor drug resistant bacilli, at least to INH. Therefore, ethambutol is added to prevent
drug resistance to INH or Rifampicin. |
|
Why only 3 drugs are given during Intensive Phase
of Cat III?
Ans: |
Smear negativity means there are few bacilli
and thus negligible chances of resistant mutant bacilli being present. |
|
Why does treatment fail?
Ans: |
Most common reason of treatment failure is
the failure to observe drug administration, which commonly results in treatment failure. |
|
What are the special precautions to protect
Rifampicin?
Ans: |
Rifampicin should be protected since
resistance to it results in much higher
failure and relapse rates. Cross-resistance also
occurs to all other Rifamycins. It should never be used without direct observation. Its
use should preferably be restricted to public health Institutions and experts. The
regimens, which minimize risk of resistance to Rifampacin, should only be used.
|
|
Why should we check sputum smear status at 2/3 months?
Ans: |
This information is essential for prolongation of intensive
phase by one month, which reduces risk of failure and relapse.
It is an important management tool and reflects on
the quality of lab, quality of treatment observation during Intensive Phase and proportion
of defaulters.
The smear status at the end of Intensive Phase
also predicts the probability of cure.
|
|
What to do if an error in smear microscopy is
detected during cross checking, especially on follow
up and at end of treatment?
Ans: |
If error is detected at the time of
diagnosis, check for other smear results, X-ray and whether patient has been started on
treatment. If the patient was missed on diagnosis, he should be traced and put on
treatment.
If an error is detected on follow-up smear
examinations, no change in treatment is undertaken based on the results of cross
examination. To some extent, there are built-in mechanisms to handle this problem for
e.g., re-examination of sputum smears after 5 months of treatment among those who are
smear positive at 4 months. However, full efforts must be made to keep the errors on
follow-up examinations to be minimum.
|
|
What is the rationale of switching to continuation
phase even if the follow-up smear examination
at end of extended Intensive Phase shows
presence of AFB?
Ans: |
With treatment of high efficacy, smears can
be positive at 2-3 months due to presence of dead bacilli. Therefore, treatment failure
based on smear examination is not considered until 5th month of treatment. |
|
Switching over to self-administered treatment in
continuous phase carries a risk of non-adherence
as it conveys relaxation in treatment at
a time when patients’ symptoms are telling that he no
longer needs treatment?
Ans: |
The treatment during continuous phase is
partially supervised and adherence is sustained by continued motivation and health
education of the patient. Operationally, it may not be feasible to supervise each dose of
continuation phase. However, all those patients who have a history of being irregular,
alcoholics etc., should be fully supervised. Other cases that are willing to be fully
supervised during continuous phase should be encouraged.
|
|
Is there a higher risk of failure among those
patients who continue to be
smear positive at the end of Intensive Phase?
Ans: |
Assuming that the history of previous
treatment was taken properly at the time of diagnosis, most patients who continue
treatment get cured, though relative risk of failure among such cases is higher compared
to those who are smear negative at the end of intensive phase. |
|
How valid is the policy of adding Streptomycin for
re-treatment cases?
Ans: |
Only a proportion of patients put on
re-treatment regimen are failure cases and likely to be resistant to one or more drugs.
Cohort analysis of patients treated so far in our country shows that two-thirds of the
patients remaining smear positive after 5 moths of treatment on Cat I and subsequently
treated with Cat II have been successfully treated. |
|
Efficacy of twice weekly (TW) regimen has been
demonstrated in many trials. Would such regimen
not reduce the workload on DOT workers?
Ans: |
In twice weekly regimen, if
patient misses one dose, it amounts to once weekly medication, which is more than lag
period for most drugs and increases the risk of development of resistance. Twice weekly
regimen are also more toxic because of immunologically mediated adverse effects. |
|
In what conditions can Treatment be prolonged?
Ans: |
Continuation Phase may be prolonged upto 7
months with INH & Rifampicin in cases of TBM, Miliary and Spinal TB
|
|
What are the precautions to be undertaken
during ATT?
Ans: |
(i) Pyridoxin supplementation to pregnant
females, diabetics,chronic alcoholics
(ii) Discourage alcohol consumption during
treatment
(iii) Monitor for symptoms and signs consistent
with hepatic damage
(iv) Liver function tests every 2 - 3 months for
those at high risk
(v) Sterptomycin is contra - indicated during
pregnancy
(vi) Monitor side effects of sterptomycin
specially in elderly: tinnitus,
vertigo, hearing tests for higher frequencies
which are affected first,
Romberg’s Test
(vii) Avoid loop diuretics, which potentiate side
effects of ‘Streptomycin’.
(viii) Analgesics for arthralgia which usually
does not require withdrawal of
anti-TB treatment.
(ix) In case of suspected preexisting
ophthomological disease, assess visual
acuity and colour vision before starting treatment
(x) Stop ethambutol in case of side effects, which
are reversible
(xi) Avoid ethambutol among children < 6 years
(xii) Avoid ‘Streptomycin’ and
‘Ethambutol’ in renal disease
(xiii) Avoid Antacids that decrease drug
absorption
(xiv) Women to use non- hormonal contraceptive
methods
(xv) In case of hypersensitivity reaction,
withdraw treatment completely
and desensitize later
(xvi) Monitor steroids, oral anti-coagulants,
anti-convulsants, oral hypoglycaemics, tranquilizers, theophylline, beta-blockers, calcium
channel blockers, digoxin when given concurrently with Rifampicin.
Evaluate each patient by interview and clinical
examination for emergence of side effects at the end of each month.
|
|
What is the role of Fluroquinolones in treatment
of TB?
Ans: |
These drugs are moderately effective with
other drugs for MDRTB and should only be given if standard drugs not tolerable. |
|
What are the problems in treatment with second
line drugs?
Ans: |
(i) These drugs are less efficacious and more
toxic.
(ii) They possess cross resistance to first line
drugs
(iii) Most patients needing such treatment are
difficult to hold e.g. alcoholics, drug addicts, migrants etc,
(iv) Hospitalization is a must for observation and
regularizing treatment. Ambulatory treatment is possible only after tolerance and
regularity assured.
(v) It is irrational for any country to divert
resources to treating with second line drugs until full potential of SCC regimen has been
achieved.
Requirement of the reserve drugs indicates poor program.
|
|
What are the guidelines for treatment of TB among children?
Ans: |
If a child is diagnosed to have tuberculosis, a full course
of treatment has to be given. Children rarely suffer from smear positive disease. As a
result, there are few bacilli in the lesions and no chance of resistant mutants being
present. The recommended regimen is Cat III. The dose of drug has to be calculated in mg
per kg body weight and given from loose drug stock. For patients with military or
meningeal TB, a fourth drug, streptomycin can be added and the total duration made to 9
months. |
|
Why is it necessary to carefully elicit history of
previous treatment?
Ans: |
The history of previous treatment should be
elicited clearly for deciding on the proper category of treatment for the patient.
Otherwise, cases may be given wrong treatment that may lead to treatment failure. |
|
How to treat TB patient also suffering from liver
disease?
Ans: |
In chronic liver disease, 2 EHRZ / 6 HR can
be given unless there is severe liver damage. If ascitis and portal hypertension are
present, treat with 2 SHE / 10 HE.
In case of acute hepatitis, the treatment may be
deferred. If TB is serious, treat with 3 SE or 3 SE + ofloxacin followed by 6 HR when
hepatitis is recovered.
|
|
What to do if jaundice develops in a case during
treatment?
Ans: |
Stop all drugs and monitor serum
transaminases. Usually treatment can be re-started with the same regimen after the serum
levels of transaminases return to normal. In serious cases, Ethambutol and Streptomycin
which are least hepato-toxic can be given. |
|
How to treat TB patients also suffering from Renal
Failure?
Ans: |
Drugs eliminated by non-renal routes –
INH, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Thioamides may be given in normal doses.
2 HRZ / 4 HR is safe.
Decrease dose of Streptomycin & Ethambutol and
adjust by renal function tests.
|
|
|
Is
there any role for preventive therapy under RNTCP?
Ans: |
Risk of breakdown from infection to disease is maximum during the period immediately
following infection especially among young children. So, asymptomatic child contacts less
than 6 years old are routinely recommended chemoprophylaxis. |
|
In RNTCP, asymptomatic child contacts of smear +ve cases and <6 years of
age are given
preventive treatment without eliciting the infection status by a tuberculin
test. On the other
hand a very low cut off point of 6mm is chosen for continuation of
preventive chemotherapy
beyond 3 months? What it the rationale?
Ans: |
Tuberculin test may be negative in the window
period. Since the risk of breakdown is maximum during the period immediately following
infection especially among young children, asymptomatic child contacts are recommended
chemoprophylaxis irrespective of the tuberculin test result.
INH given for 3 months reduces the tuberculin size
considerably, so a low cut off is used for further continuation.
|
|
How do you foresee the role of RNTCP in preventing
MDRTB?
Ans: |
The only effective means of preventing MDRTB
is to prevent emergence of such cases by DOTS. The proportion of cases with MDR has been
demonstrated to come down with implementation of DOTS, in a number of places all over the
world viz. Texas, New York, Peru. In Botswana where DOTS is being implemented, the
proportion of MDRTB is one twentieth of that in other African countries where DOTS is not
being implemented. At RNTCP sites in India, the proportion of patients put on cat II has
been seen to reduce gradually. Experience shows if we make sure that patients receive
every dose of drugs, the emergence of MDR TB can be prevented. |
|
What is the role of BCG in TB control?
Ans: |
BCG prevents childhood form of TB like
disseminated and miliary TB, but has no role in preventing TB in adults especially
cavitary forms. |
|
EVALUATION
How can we evaluate the impact of
RNTCP?
Ans: |
Because of high cure rates, the proportion of
re-treatment cases should decrease. There should be decline in prevalence of initial drug
resistance.
In the community, the impact of any change in
disease situation is first reflected in a change in annual risk of infection (ARI) rates.
Therefore, repeated ARI surveys along with age distribution of cases can be relied upon
for assessment of disease trends in the community.
The decline in prevalence of disease occurs next
and decline in disease incidence takes much longer. |
|
|